Hiking Backpack Hub: Honest buying guides, sizing help & how-tos
In-Depth Guide Researched & Fact-Checked

Fastpacking vs Ultralight Backpacking

Compare fastpacking and ultralight backpacking: pace, gear philosophy, pack style, daily mileage and which approach fits your trip and fitness level.

Affiliate disclosure: this page contains affiliate links. Purchases made through them may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure.

In plain English

Both styles are about carrying less. Ultralight backpacking means walking a trail for several days with the lightest gear you can safely get away with. Fastpacking takes the same idea and adds running: you jog the flat and downhill parts and walk the climbs, so you cover more ground each day.

Running changes the pack you need. A normal backpack sways when you jog, a bit like a loose shopping bag swinging from your shoulder. Fastpackers use a pack shaped like a snug vest that hugs the body and stays put. Ultralight hikers can use a wider range of packs because walking is gentler on the load.

The gear inside is often almost the same: a small tent or tarp, a light quilt instead of a bulky sleeping bag, and simple food. The big difference is you. Fastpacking asks for running fitness, while ultralight backpacking mostly asks for good planning and a willingness to leave extras at home.

Fastpacking vs Ultralight Backpacking — the two options shown side by side for comparison

Fastpacking and ultralight backpacking share a minimalist gear philosophy but differ in pace and pack design: fastpacking mixes running and hiking to cover more ground each day in a body-hugging vest-style pack, while ultralight backpacking keeps a steady hiking pace using a lightweight framed or frameless pack with a base weight typically under 10 pounds.

Is fastpacking the same as ultralight backpacking?

No. Both trim base weight aggressively, but fastpacking adds a running component that ultralight backpacking doesn't require. A fastpacker alternates running and hiking depending on terrain, so gear has to work at both gaits without bouncing. An ultralight backpacker moves at a fast hiking pace the entire time and can use a wider range of pack styles, since there's no running motion to destabilize a poorly fitted load.

Runner-hiker and a slow backpacker meeting at a trail summit

Can you fastpack with an ultralight backpacking pack?

Yes, for shorter trips or lower total pack weights. A frameless ultralight pack in the 35 to 45-liter range, like those built for 35-45L weekend trips, can work for fastpacking if it's cinched down tight and the load stays light, but its taller profile and lack of a running-specific harness make it bounce more than a dedicated fastpacking pack once the pace increases. Runners doing serious fastpacking usually switch to a purpose-built vest-style pack once mileage or speed goals get demanding.

How does gear selection differ between the two?

Both approaches start from the same base-weight math, but fastpacking pushes further on a few specific items:

Fastpacker striding downhill with poles across a stony pasture
  • Shelter: Ultralight backpackers often carry a trekking-pole tent; fastpackers frequently drop to a bivy or minimal tarp to save pack volume, not just weight.
  • Sleep system: Both use quilts or compact bags, but fastpackers size down further since nights are shorter on high-mileage itineraries.
  • Cook system: Ultralight backpackers commonly still cook; many fastpackers skip cooking entirely and eat cold, calorie-dense food to save pack weight and time.
  • Footwear: Ultralight backpackers lean toward trail runners or light hikers; fastpackers almost always run in trail-running shoes for the running sections.
  • Pack style: Ultralight backpacking uses framed or frameless hiking packs; fastpacking uses vest-style or lightly framed running packs for a no-bounce fit.

Which approach suits a given hiker?

Ultralight backpacking suits hikers who want lighter shoulders and faster days without adopting a running gait, and it works across nearly any fitness level once pack weight drops. Fastpacking suits hikers who already run or trail-run regularly and want to cover thru-hike-length routes in a fraction of the usual time. Fitness and running experience matter more for fastpacking than for ultralight backpacking, since sustaining a run-hike rhythm over multiple days demands more cardiovascular conditioning than walking the same miles.

Spreading two gear lists: light kit and ultralight kit, on grass

How do daily mileage targets compare?

Ultralight backpackers usually keep a hiking gait, a pace most hikers can sustain with a lighter-than-average pack. Fastpackers' daily distances vary more with terrain and fitness, because running the flat and downhill sections adds miles that a hiking pace can't match. That wider range is also why fastpacking itineraries vary more than ultralight backpacking ones: a technical, rocky route limits running opportunities and can flatten the mileage gap between the two approaches almost entirely.

Does pack weight target differ between the two?

Both approaches chase a low base weight, but the numbers used to hit "ultralight" differ slightly by context. Ultralight backpacking generally targets a base weight — everything except food, water and fuel — under 10 pounds. Fastpacking uses total pack weight, including food and water, as the more useful number, since that figure determines how the pack rides at a run; keeping total weight low is the common fastpacking goal. A fastpacker with a 10-pound ultralight base weight can easily land under that 15-pound total once a day or two of food and water is added, which is part of why the two approaches share so much gear in practice.

Can the same gear list work for both?

In most cases, yes, with adjustments to shelter and food. A three-season ultralight gear list built around a trekking-pole tent, quilt and closed-cell foam pad transfers directly to fastpacking, and many hikers use the identical kit for both. The main changes fastpackers make are trading a taller tent for a lower-profile bivy or tarp to cut pack volume, and simplifying food to reduce both weight and pack space, since a fastpacking pack has less room than a typical ultralight backpacking pack in the 35-45L weekend range.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not strictly, but fastpacking assumes you can comfortably run some trail miles. Hikers without a running background can start by hiking fast and jogging short, flat or downhill stretches, building running capacity before attempting a full fastpacking itinerary with big daily mileage.

Not necessarily. Both rely on similar lightweight shelters, quilts and pads, so most of the cost overlaps. Fastpacking may add a dedicated running vest or fastpack and trail-running shoes, but a hiker with existing ultralight gear can often fastpack without buying an entirely new kit.

Continue Reading

What base weight does and doesn't count

Base weight is the number both camps chase, and the definitions come from gear makers and trail groups rather than any standards body. The Appalachian Trail Conservancy defines it as pack weight with all gear minus consumables such as food, water and fuel, and notes that the pack, shelter and sleeping bag, the big three, are usually the heaviest pieces.4 A 2014 Gossamer Gear article set the tiers most hikers still quote: lightweight under 20 pounds, ultralight under 10 and superultralight under 5.1 Zpacks says ultralight is generally agreed to mean 10 pounds or less.2

None of those definitions mentions worn clothing, while this page's definition leaves it out, so check how any gear list you compare against handles it. The gap between base weight and total weight is mostly water and food. Water weighs about a kilogram per liter,5 so two liters adds roughly 4.4 pounds to a fastpack before any food goes in. That is why fastpackers watch total weight: it is what bounces when you run.

Why speed and weight cost so much energy

The Compendium of Physical Activities rates backpacking at 7.0 METs and hiking with a daypack at 7.8, while climbing hills with a load of 20 pounds or more at a moderate to brisk pace reaches 10.0.6 One MET is roughly the energy you use sitting quietly.7 Load research adds to the picture: in one lab study, energy use rose roughly in a straight line with pack weight, by about 7.6 watts per extra kilogram,8 and a military review found cost climbs with load, body mass, speed and grade together.9

That stacking effect is why fastpackers cut weight so hard: every pound is multiplied by a faster pace. It also explains the food question. A study of extreme endurance events found sustained energy use levels off below about three times basal metabolic rate, and that the gut can supply only about 2.5 times, so anything above that draws down body stores.10 On a multi-day fastpack, calorie-dense food that is quick to eat is a practical answer to a real limit.

Shoes, feet and the run-hike gait

Weight on the feet costs far more than weight on the back. A review of soldier load carriage found each kilogram added to the foot raises energy use by 7 to 10%, against about 4% for the thigh.9 That is a big reason fastpackers wear trail-running shoes. The trade-off is support: KEEN says a boot's extra stability can be welcome under a fully loaded pack, while lighter shoes are built for low weight and breathability.11

Feet also take the most damage. A 2023 systematic review found blisters and ankle sprains are the most common hiking injuries, with blisters making up 8 to 33% of reported injuries.12 Dermatologists recommend moisture-wicking socks and shoes that fit neither too tight nor too loose, and suggest stopping when skin turns red or painful.13 Running multiplies friction, so a fastpacker's sock and shoe choices matter at least as much as the pack.

How the mileage figures hold up

The 15 to 25 and 20 to 50-plus mile ranges on this page describe common practice, not a measured study, and terrain can swamp them. A University of Utah analysis of GPS data from nearly 30,000 people found a slow flat mile took about 33 minutes while the same mile on a 30-degree slope took about 97, and that people move fastest on a slight downhill.3 A peer-reviewed paper on the same data calls slope a critical factor in hiking speed.14

Mountaineering Scotland lists fitness, pack weight, wind and ground conditions alongside slope as things that set walking speed.15 On a rocky, steep route, the running advantage mostly disappears, which is exactly why the gap between the two styles can shrink to almost nothing.